Detection of Pus Sample of Various Pyogenic Infections from Diabetic and Non Diabetic Patient and Compare their Socioeconomic Status in Bangladesh
Keywords:
Pus, pyogenic infection, diabetic and non diabetic, socioeconomic status, OPD.Abstract
These studies were conducted for microbiological detection of pus sample from various pyogenic infections of diabetic and non diabetic hospitalized (OPD patients) and compare their socio-economical condition of Bangladesh. 100 samples were collected of which 90% was positive isolates.
Among this all isolates Streptococcus sp 35.55% rather than E.coli 28.88%. Diabetic patients (100%) were more vulnerable for pyogenic infection than non-diabetic patients (82.88%). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the isolates were highly sensitive to Cefuroxime, Cefixime, moderate sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Azitromycin where as Cotrimoxazole, Ampicillin, Nalidixic Acid, Chloramphenical highly resistant to Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and E.coli.All ages of patients were admitted in OPD section in the hospital during the year 2014, Upazila Sirajdikhan, Munshigonj.For socio-economical analysis about the patients sign and symptoms of infection, duration of infection, pyogenic pathogen and bacteraemia were considered as key variables for analysis.On admission characteristics of cases and non-Fatal controls were comparable except for age. The study was showed that multi drug resistant is associated with diarrhea in Munshigonj, Bangladesh.
References
[2] Infection of the diabetic diabeticfoot.Availableathttp://www.Braces&supports.com./
[3] McMahon M.M and Bistrian, B.R. (1995).Host defenses and susceptibility to infection in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 9: 1-721(4):246.251
[4] Bhatia, J.Y. Pandey, K. Rodrigues, C., Meetha, A., JOSHI, V. R. (2003). Postoperative wound infection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A postoperative study with evaluation of risk factors. Ind. J. Med. Microbial. 21(4):246.251
[5] Louie, A., Balch, A. L. and smith, R. B. (1993).Gram-negative bacteria surveillance in diabetic patients. Infect. Med., 10 (2): 33-45
[6] Beckert, S. et al., (2006). A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcer: Prospective analysis of 1000 patients diabetes care, 29 (5): 988-992.
[7] Eaglstein, W. H. (1997) chronic wounds. Surgical C1N Am.77 (3): 689-700.
[8] Piaggesi, A., et al., (2007). An off the shelf instant contact casting device for the management of diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetic care, 30 (3): 586-590.
[9] Armstrong, D. G., Lavery, L. A. And Harkless, L. B. (1998), Validation of a diabetic wound classification system, Diabetes care, 21(5): 855-859.
[10] Lavery, L. A. et al., (2007), preventing diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients. Diabetes care, 30: 14-20.
[11] Devraj S, goyal R, Jialal I. London: Touch Briefings; 2008, Inflammation, oxidative stress and metabolic syndrome of endocrinology; PP. 32-7.
[12] Muller LM, Gorter KJ, Hak E, Goudzwaard WL, Schellevis FG, Hoepelman Al, et al. Increased risk of common infections in patient with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41:281-8.
[13] Marble A, white HJ, Fernald AT, The nature of the lowered resistance to infection in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest.1938; 17:423-30.
[14] Marble A, white HJ, Fernald AT, The nature of the lowered resistance to infection in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest.1938; 17:423-30.
[15] Zubair M,Abida M, Jamal A. Clinical bacteriology and risk factors for the diabetic foot infection with multidrug resistance microorganisms in North India. Biol Med. 2010; 2:22-34.
[16] Luo G, Spell berg B, Gebremariam T, Boris M, Lee H, Fu Y, et al. Diabetic murine models for Acinetobacter baumannil infection. J Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012, 67: 1439-45.
[17] Sarkar PK, Ballantyne S. Management of leg ulcers. Postgard Med J 2000; 76:674-82.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
