Yes, HCI Can Conciliate XBRL Financial Reporting Software and Their Users
Keywords:XBRL financial reporting, HCI, HCI design, e-Government, G2G
This paper presents the results of a previously proposed research to mitigate the literature gap found between Human-Computer Interaction and Government to Government e-governance regarding the XBRL financial reporting area. This research conducted two usability and User eXperience evaluations with two different versions of an XBRL financial reporting software prototype. Initially the application provided XBRL knowledge abstraction and underwent HCI redesign to improve task efficiency. The results showed HCI design is a valid way to mitigate the XBRL knowledge required to elaborate XBRL financial reports problem, to improve XBRL financial reporting task efficiency, thus improving B2G and G2G e-Governance practices.
. B. S. d. Silva and S. D. J. Barbosa, Interação Humano-Computador. 2010.
. I. N. da Costa. “USERBILITY: UMA TÉCNICA PARA AVALIAÇÃO DA EXPERIÊNCIA DO USUÁRIO E USABILIDADE EM APLICATIVOS MÓVEIS”. MSc. dissertation, Instituto de Computação Programa de Pós-graduação em Informática, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, 2016.
. Luis Rivero and Tayana Conte. “A Systematic Mapping Study on Research Contributions on UX Evaluation Technologies” in Proc. BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2017, pp. 41-50.
. XBRL INTERNATIONAL. “An introduction to XBRL: The basics of XBRL for business and accounting professionals” Internet: https://www.xbrl.org/the-standard/what/anintroduction-to-xbrl/, [Jun. 17, 2020].
. EUROPEAN SECURITIES MARKETS AUTHORITY, “Consultation paper: consultation paper on the regulatory technical standards on the european single electronic format (ESEF),” tech. rep., Paris, France, 2015.
. R. W. Caves. Encyclopedia of the City. New York, Usa: Routledge, 2005. 596 p.
. C. Hai and I. Jeong. Fundamental of development administration. S. L: Scholar, 2007.
. S. Bose and M. R. Rashel. “Implementing e-governance using oecd model (modified) and gartner model (modified) upon agriculture of Bangladesh” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2007.
. TESOURO NACIONAL. “Apresentação” Internet: https://siconfi.tesouro.gov.br/siconfi/pages/public /conteudo/conteudo.jsf?id=21. [Jul. 17, 2020].
. A.R.D.A.A. Oliveira and P.C. da Silva. “Conciliating XBRL Financial Reporting and HCI”. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, vol 74, pp.46-60, Nov. 2020.
. M. Deru and R. Neßelrath. “AutoUI-ML”. in Proc. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERVASIVE DISPLAYS, 2015.
. M. Xiaofeng, W. Xufei, Z. Xiucai, L. Zhenliang and J. Ruisheng. “Research on IETM authoring platform architecture based on S1000D specification”. in Proc. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, 2015.
. S. S. Bhowmick, C. Dyreson, B. Choi and M. Ang. “Interruption-Sensitive Empty Result Feedback: Rethinking the Visual Query Feedback Paradigm for Semistructured Data”. in Proc. ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2015.
. L. M. Garcia-Garcia, J. R. Gil-Garcia, and V. Gomez, “Citizen centered e-government? the case of national migration institute in the southern Mexican border,” in Proc. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2015.
. D. Shwartz-Asher, S. A. Chun, and N. R. Adam, “Social media user behavior analysis in e-government context,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2016.
. C. Maciel, C. Cappelli, C. Slaviero, and A. C. B. Garcia, “Technologies for popular participation: a research agenda,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2016.
. I. M. de Souza, C. Maciel, and C. Cappelli, “The model of accessibility to electronic government: applicability in dataprev,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2016.
. F. E. M. Quispe and M. M. Eler, “Accessibility recommendations for mobile applications: a contribution to the brazilian digital government standards,” in Proc. BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018.
. P. P. Adinda and A. Suzianti, “Redesign of user interface for e-government application using usability testing method,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2018.
. R. Baguma, “Usability evaluation of the etax portal for uganda,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE, 2018.
. N. H. Basri, W. A. W. Adnan, and H. Baharin, “E-participation service in malaysian e-government website: the user experience evaluation,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-EDUCATION, E-BUSINESS, E-MANAGEMENT AND E-LEARNING, 2019.
. N. Almrezeq, R. Alhamdan, M. Mahyub, and M. Alfayad, “An ex-ploratory study to investigate citizens’ experience with e-government mobile services in saudi arabia,” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019.
. F. E. d. Oliveira and A. P. Freire, “Aceitação e uso de tecnologias interativas de governo eletrônico por pessoas com deficiência” in Proc. BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2017.
. L. A. Rodrigues and S. S. Prietch, “Analysis, redesign and validation of accessibility resources applied to an official electronic journal for the promotion of equal access to public acts,” in Proc. BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2018.
. C. Maciel, L. Roque, and A. C. Garcia, “Mensurando a maturidade na tomada de decisão em sistemas de e-participatição,” in Proc. SIMPOSIO BRASILEIRO SOBRE FATORES HUMANOS EM SISTEMAS COMPUTACIONAIS, 2019.
. TESOURO NACIONAL “Documentação” Internet: https://siconfi.tesouro.gov.br/siconfi/pages/public/ conteudo/conteudo.jsf?id=581[Jul. 17, 2020].
. FUJITSU. “Interstage XWand Toolkit Evaluation Copy Download” Internet: https://www.fujitsu.com/ global/products/software/middleware/application-infrastructure/interstage/download/xwand-toolkit-evaluati on-download.html [Jul. 17, 2020].
. J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro. “The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale” in Proc. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN, 2009, pp. 94-103.
. P. Desmet, K. Overbeeke and S. Tax. “Designing Products with Added Emotional Value: development and appllcation of an approach for research through design”. The Design Journal, vol. 4, pp. 32-47, Mar. 2001.
. D. G. Caicedo. “Designing the new PrEmo: an empirical research on how to improve the emotion measuring tool” MSc. dissertation, Faculty Of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University Of Technology, Delft, 2009.
. Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. “Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential”, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 1994.
. J. B. Silva, and A. H. Kronbauer. “A Study of Hedonic Experience Related to UX Capture Techniques” in Proc. BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2018. p. 1-10.
. DEBORAH HINDERER SOVA and JAKOB NIELSEN. (2020) 234 Tips and Tricks for Recruiting Users as Participants in Usability Studies. [On-line]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/reports/how-to-recruit-participants-usability-studies/ [11 Aug, 2020].
How to Cite
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.